"Federal Courts Crack Down on 'Judge Shopping' with New Policy"

TL;DR Summary
The federal judiciary has approved a new policy to combat "judge shopping" by randomly assigning civil actions seeking to bar or implement state or federal actions to judges throughout a district, aiming to prevent litigants from filing cases before specific judges to secure favorable decisions. The policy aims to address concerns over national injunctions and the strategic selection of judges for conservative cases, but it may not fully eliminate forum shopping as litigants can still choose districts and courts based on their preferences and the composition of the court.
- Federal Courts Aim to Curb Judge Shopping With New Policy (3) Bloomberg Law
- The federal courts’ new “judge shopping” rules are a major blow to Republicans Vox.com
- U.S. courts require random judge assignments to avoid 'judge shopping' The Washington Post
- Federal courts make it harder to 'judge-shop' as was done in abortion pill case NBC News
- Federal courts move against 'judge-shopping' - POLITICO POLITICO
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
848 → 89 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Bloomberg Law