"Debate Over Judicial Discretion in 'Judge-Shopping' Policy"

TL;DR Summary
The federal judiciary released a revised policy recommending random assignment of judges in civil cases with statewide or national implications, addressing concerns about "judge shopping." The policy is not a mandate and does not apply to criminal or bankruptcy cases. Conservative judges and lawmakers have criticized the change, accusing the Judicial Conference and Democrats of attempting to grab power from conservative jurists in isolated jurisdictions. Some judges have expressed concerns about the practicality of implementing a random-case-assignment policy in geographically large districts.
Topics:nation#case-assignment#federal-judiciary#judge-shopping#law-and-politics#policy-clarification#us-courts
- Federal police against ‘judge-shopping’ is guidance, not binding, officials say The Washington Post
- How John Roberts just won a victory over rogue, lawless Trump judges. Slate
- Why the Republican reaction to Texas ‘judge-shopping’ was so revealing MSNBC
- Judicial body says courts have discretion on new 'judge-shopping' policy after GOP backlash NBC News
- Mitch McConnell Urges Courts To Ignore New Rules Meant To Prevent 'Judge-Shopping' Yahoo! Voices
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
93%
1,214 → 82 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post