"Debate Over Judicial Discretion in 'Judge-Shopping' Policy"

1 min read
Source: The Washington Post
"Debate Over Judicial Discretion in 'Judge-Shopping' Policy"
Photo: The Washington Post
TL;DR Summary

The federal judiciary released a revised policy recommending random assignment of judges in civil cases with statewide or national implications, addressing concerns about "judge shopping." The policy is not a mandate and does not apply to criminal or bankruptcy cases. Conservative judges and lawmakers have criticized the change, accusing the Judicial Conference and Democrats of attempting to grab power from conservative jurists in isolated jurisdictions. Some judges have expressed concerns about the practicality of implementing a random-case-assignment policy in geographically large districts.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

6 min

vs 7 min read

Condensed

93%

1,21482 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The Washington Post