Supreme Court Tackles Ambiguous Interpretation of 'and' in Landmark Case

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court will hear a case regarding the interpretation of the word "and" in a 2018 criminal justice overhaul. The dispute revolves around whether the word means "and" or "or" in a provision aimed at reducing mandatory minimum sentences for low-level, nonviolent drug dealers who cooperate with prosecutors. The decision could impact thousands of prison sentences each year, potentially affecting over 10,000 people sentenced since the law took effect. The court's ruling will determine the eligibility criteria for sentence reductions and could have significant implications for defendants and the criminal justice system.
Topics:nation#criminal-justice#law-and-justice#mandatory-minimum-sentences#safety-valve-provision#sentence-reductions#supreme-court
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
861 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Yahoo News