Finding Balance: Supreme Court Weighs Mandatory Gun Sentences in Brown v. United States Oral Argument

1 min read
Source: The New York Times
Finding Balance: Supreme Court Weighs Mandatory Gun Sentences in Brown v. United States Oral Argument
Photo: The New York Times
TL;DR Summary

The Supreme Court heard arguments on which drug offenses trigger mandatory 15-year sentences under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The justices considered three options for determining which drug offenses count under the law, which refers to a schedule of controlled substances overseen by the attorney general. The middle ground option, using the schedule in place when the defendant committed the federal gun crime, seemed to gain traction among the justices. The case raises questions about the application of mandatory sentences and the impact of changes to the drug schedule on sentencing.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

1

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

4 min

vs 5 min read

Condensed

89%

81491 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The New York Times