"Supreme Court Divided Over Expert Testimony in Drug 'Mule' Case Appeal"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court is considering whether prosecutors can use expert testimony to infer that individuals convicted of being drug mules generally know what they are transporting, as in the case of Delilah Guadalupe Diaz, who was found with methamphetamine in her car. Diaz, who claims she didn't know about the drugs, is appealing her drug trafficking conviction. The justices expressed skepticism about both sides' interpretations of the law, with indications that the government could ultimately prevail. The case raises questions about the admissibility of expert testimony regarding a defendant's mental state in drug trafficking cases.
Topics:nation#border-patrol#delilah-guadalupe-diaz#drug-trafficking#expert-testimony#law-and-crime#supreme-court
- Supreme Court wrestles with dispute over expert testimony in drug 'mule' case NBC News
- [Diaz v. United States] Oral Argument C-SPAN
- US Supreme Court appears split over appeal by convicted border drug 'mule' Yahoo! Voices
- Supreme Court divided over expert testimony in drug trafficking case Courthouse News Service
- Justices Search for Sweet Spot on Testimony on Criminal Mind Bloomberg Law
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
85%
627 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NBC News