Supreme Court's Impact on Corruption Convictions.

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court has unanimously vacated the convictions of two men found guilty of violating federal laws against fraud, striking another blow against prosecutors' efforts to bring federal charges against self-dealing politicians. The court believes that federal anti-corruption laws are too broad and need to be narrowed to cover a limited subset of explicit corruption, such as bribery, extortion, or an exchange of actual property or money in return for a government favor. This decision reflects the court's increasingly cramped view of what counts as bribery and fraud, which is not good for the judiciary or democracy.
- Supreme Court corruption cases: All nine justices continue the assault on federal fraud laws. Slate
- The Supreme Court and Cuomo's Cronies - WSJ The Wall Street Journal
- U.S. Supreme Court tosses Percoco, Kaloyeros convictions NEWS10 ABC
- Churchill: The conviction of Joe Percoco isn't funny anymore Times Union
- What Supreme Court fraud rulings mean for prosecuting corruption WBUR News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
955 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate