"Supreme Court's Impact on Civil Rights and HR: A Tactical Overview"

TL;DR Summary
In the Muldrow v. St. Louis case, the Supreme Court delivered a significant victory for civil rights by unanimously siding with Jatonya Muldrow, a police officer who argued she was discriminated against on the basis of sex when she was transferred to a less active job. Justice Elena Kagan wrote a strong opinion, maintaining the harm requirement for Title VII claims, which prevented the case from being used to attack diversity initiatives and DEI training. The decision narrowly avoided the risk of being used to combat workplace diversity and secured a meaningful victory for the left, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh being the only dissenting voice.
- Supreme Court: Elena Kagan's tactical victory for civil rights plaintiffs. Slate
- The latest Supreme Court decision means HR departments must play by a whole new set of rules. Here's what every CHRO needs to know Yahoo Finance
- Samuel Alito Can't Tell the Difference Between Sex Discrimination and Peanut Butter The Nation
- How the Supreme Court's Muldrow decision could complicate the DEI landscape Axios
- The Supreme Court eases access to discrimination suits over job transfers NPR
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
959 → 105 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate