"Legal Battle Ensues Over Privacy of Alleged Brothel Clients' Hearings in Massachusetts"

TL;DR Summary
Attorneys for alleged clients of a Greater Boston brothel network are arguing against public access to their initial hearings, stating that it would subject the accused to humiliation and potential career and personal repercussions. They assert that the accused are entitled to privacy at this early stage in the proceedings and that public hearings should remain the exception rather than the rule. The Supreme Judicial Court has delayed the initial hearings and requested the clerk-magistrate to justify her decision to open the hearings to the public.
Topics:nation#alleged-brothel-clients#crime#legal-proceedings#privacy-rights#public-hearings#supreme-judicial-court
- Here’s why the alleged brothel clients’ attorneys say their hearings should be kept private Boston.com
- Top Massachusetts court judge orders answers from magistrate who opened brothel hearings The Boston Globe
- Mass. brothel suspects make case to keep court hearings closed WCVB Channel 5 Boston
- Defense attorneys argue against open hearings in Cambridge sex-ring case WBUR News
- Alleged clients in Mass. brothel bust case push to keep initial hearings private NBC10 Boston
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
805 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Boston.com