AI Chatbots Enter Academic Peer Review Process
TL;DR Summary
A study led by James Zou from Stanford reveals that 7-17% of sentences in peer reviews for computer science articles in 2023-2024 were generated by large language models (LLMs). These AI-generated reviews are characterized by a formal tone, verbosity, and a lack of specificity, often appearing close to submission deadlines. Zou suggests that fostering more human interactions in the review process, such as through platforms like OpenReview, could mitigate the dominance of AI in peer reviews.
LLM Chatbots Are Now “Peer-Reviewing” Papers Daily Nous
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
72%
275 → 76 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Daily Nous