Sunak's Critique of Covid Science and Lockdown Communication

TL;DR Summary
Rishi Sunak's evidence at the Covid Inquiry suggests that the costs of lockdown may have outweighed the benefits, based on analysis by Imperial College and Manchester University. Sunak highlighted errors in data collection and analysis, which overestimated transmission rates and prolonged restrictions. He also pointed out that there was scientific dissent within Sage, with conflicting views on issues such as face masks and when infections would peak. Sunak called for a new module in the Covid Inquiry to examine what worked and what did not, as lessons need to be learned.
- Was the Covid science wrong? What the Sunak documents tell us The Telegraph
- Sunak criticises COVID comms PR Week
- What QALYs reveal about lockdowns - The Post UnHerd
- The Covid Inquiry is ignoring the one number that would blow lockdown out of the water The Telegraph
- Sunak: construction misunderstood our lockdown message Construction News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
93%
1,377 → 91 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Telegraph