Most statin side effects lack evidence, major meta-analysis finds

TL;DR Summary
A Lancet meta-analysis of 19 large randomized trials (over 122,000 participants) finds that most reported statin side effects are not supported by reliable evidence, with real adverse effects being rare (about 1% muscle symptoms; rare rhabdomyolysis; small increases in liver tests and glucose for those near diabetes thresholds). The benefits remain substantial: roughly 25% lower risk of heart attack or stroke and meaningful LDL reductions, with inexpensive generic options (~$40/year). Updated PREVENT-based risk estimates could expand who should start statins, underscoring that fears of side effects should not unduly deter appropriate preventive therapy.
- Statins don’t cause most of the side effects on package warnings, study finds statnews.com
- Most statin side-effects not caused by the drugs, study finds The Guardian
- Labels on statins overstate side effects, study finds Financial Times
- Statins don’t cause the majority of ‘side effects’ on the label SMH.com.au
- Statin pills much safer than advertised, major review finds BBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
16
Time Saved
7 min
vs 8 min read
Condensed
94%
1,543 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on statnews.com