UK Supreme Court Rules AI Cannot Be Named as Patent 'Inventor'

TL;DR Summary
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be recognized as an inventor in a landmark case regarding patent rights. The case involved a U.S. computer scientist who sought to register patents for inventions created by his AI system. The UK's Intellectual Property Office rejected the application, stating that an inventor must be a human or a company. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this decision, clarifying that under UK patent law, an inventor must be a natural person. The ruling has raised questions about how the patent system should handle AI-generated inventions, and the government will review this area of law.
- AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case Reuters
- AI systems can't be named as the inventor of patents, UK's top court rules ABC News
- AI Can't Be Patent 'Inventor', Says UK Supreme Case In Landmark Ruling NDTV
- AI cannot be named as an 'inventor,' top UK court says in patent dispute CNBC
- AI machine cannot be called an inventor, rules UK court Financial Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
79%
500 → 104 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters