UK Supreme Court: AI Cannot Be Patented or Named as an Inventor

TL;DR Summary
The UK Supreme Court has upheld previous decisions rejecting a bid to allow an artificial intelligence (AI) to be named as an inventor in a patent application. The court concluded that "an inventor must be a person" and that an AI cannot be named as an inventor to secure patent rights. The decision does not address whether the AI in question actually invented the items. The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) welcomed the judgment and stated that the UK patent system will continue to support AI innovation. However, legal experts anticipate growing pressure for changes to existing laws as AIs become more capable of generating novel ideas.
- AI cannot patent inventions, UK Supreme Court confirms BBC.com
- AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case Reuters
- AI cannot be named as an 'inventor,' top UK court says in patent dispute CNBC
- UK Supreme Court rules AI is not an inventor The Verge
- AI machine cannot be called an inventor, rules UK court Financial Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
81%
571 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on BBC.com