Bitcoin ETFs: SEC's String Attachment and Investor Costs

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is requiring Bitcoin ETF issuers to carry out transactions with cash instead of Bitcoin for in-kind redemptions, resulting in added complication and increased costs for retail investors. This decision deviates from the norm of in-kind transactions in other ETFs and could potentially make Bitcoin ETFs less attractive. The SEC's reasoning may be to minimize opportunities for manipulation or due to the agency's chairman wanting to impose stricter terms after a defeat in court. Meanwhile, the number of companies turning to blockchain-based loans has increased by 55% in 2023, Coinbase plans to appeal the SEC's rejection of its digital assets framework, and a trio of crypto Super PACs has raised $78 million for industry lobbying in the upcoming election.
- The SEC attaches a string to Bitcoin ETFs—and investors will be the one to pay for it Fortune
- Bitcoin ETF Ad War Officially Underway With Bitwise Campaign CoinDesk
- BlackRock Has Quietly Opened The Door To A 'Trillion-Dollar Plus' Wall Street Game-Changer Amid The $700 Billion Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP And Crypto Price Boom Forbes
- Spot Bitcoin ETF will be 'bloodbath' for crypto exchanges, analyst says Cointelegraph
- 'The SEC is busier than Santa's elves' as BlackRock, Fidelity meetings fuel Bitcoin ETF hype DLNews
Reading Insights
0
1
4 min
vs 5 min read
85%
832 → 124 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fortune