Back to the table: US Returns to Iran Talks as Tehran Appears Weak

The article argues that the United States has moved back into indirect talks with Iran, choosing diplomacy over a broader confrontation after Iran’s domestic protests exposed its vulnerability. Washington aims to revive the nuclear file, while Tehran insists talks stay narrowly focused on its nuclear program; the move follows a cautious, restraint-first approach to avoid a wider war or regime change. Israel fears a nuclear deal could legitimize a brutal regime if sanctions relief strengthens Tehran, and officials warn that real accountability for Iran’s internal repression and regional behavior risks being sidelined as negotiations center on centrifuges and enrichment.
- Why the US returned to talks with Iran at its weakest The Jerusalem Post
- Trump is beset by hard dilemmas and no easy wins with Iran cnn.com
- What would be the impact of a US attack on Iran? Al Jazeera
- The U.S. May Soon Strike Iran. Here’s Why That’s a Big Deal. | U.S. News Decision Points | U.S. News usnews.com
- Trump tries gunboat diplomacy after wavering on Iran strikes Axios
Reading Insights
1
12
19 min
vs 20 min read
97%
3,939 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Jerusalem Post