"New York Times Controversies: From Gaza Coverage to Racial Targeting"

TL;DR Summary
Kibbutz Be’eri spokesperson rejects New York Times' claim that two victims were sexually assaulted during October 7 attacks, undermining the credibility of the paper's exposé. Family members contest the Times' claims, stating that the victims were shot but not sexually abused. The Times' reporting process and sources have been called into question, with conflicting accounts from the victims' family and Israeli government spokesperson. The controversy has led to internal conflict at the Times, including a leak investigation and mounting public scrutiny.
- Kibbutz Be'eri Rejects Story in New York Times October 7 Exposé: “They Were Not Sexually Abused” The Intercept
- New York Times Launches Leak Investigation Over Report on Its Israel-Gaza Coverage Vanity Fair
- New York Times Is in a Spat with Its Union over Allegations of the Paper’s ‘Racial Targeting’ National Review
- The New York Times stands by its reporting on the Hamas terror attack after questions are raised CNN
- How the Times stumbled on a sensitive Israel story Semafor
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
14 min
vs 15 min read
Condensed
97%
2,952 → 81 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Intercept