"Judge Rules Against Prince Harry's Legal Fight for UK Security After US Move"

TL;DR Summary
A London judge ruled that Prince Harry was not unfairly stripped of his UK security detail after moving to the US, stating that the decision to provide security on a case-by-case basis was not unlawful. Harry, who has taken legal action against the government and tabloid publishers, claimed that he and his family were endangered during visits to the UK due to hostility on social media and media hounding. Despite winning a phone hacking case against a tabloid publisher, he recently withdrew a libel case against the Daily Mail. Harry's efforts to privately pay for London's police force to guard him were also denied by a judge.
- Judge rules Prince Harry was not unfairly stripped of UK security detail after he moved to the US The Associated Press
- Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Security Downgrade The New York Times
- Judge rules Prince Harry was not unfairly stripped of U.K. security detail after he moved to the U.S. NBC News
- Prince Harry loses high court challenge to personal security downgrade The Guardian
- Prince Harry Loses Legal Fight for Police Protection in the U.K. PEOPLE
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
79%
509 → 107 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Associated Press