Supreme Court's Perspective on Article 370: Intent, Consultation, and Self-Limitation

1 min read
Source: The Indian Express
Supreme Court's Perspective on Article 370: Intent, Consultation, and Self-Limitation
Photo: The Indian Express
TL;DR Summary

The Supreme Court of India stated that Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was never intended to be permanent. The reference to Article 1 in Article 370, a permanent feature of the Constitution, indicates that Article 370 was not meant to be permanent. The inclusion of Article 1 in Article 370 during the interim period was to emphasize that Article 1 is a permanent part of the Constitution. The court also questioned whether the Constitution of India can be altered in ways contrary to the founders' intentions. The arguments on the case concluded, and the Centre will present its arguments on Thursday.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

2 min

vs 3 min read

Condensed

82%

577106 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The Indian Express