Trump's Free-Speech Rights Challenged in 2020 Election Interference Case
TL;DR Summary
Lawyers representing former President Donald Trump argue that a protective order in a legal case would infringe upon his free-speech rights, as they seek to prevent the release of certain documents. The lawyers contend that the order, which would restrict the dissemination of evidence, would impede Trump's ability to publicly discuss the case and defend himself. This argument is part of an ongoing legal battle involving Trump and the release of documents related to his presidency.
- Trump's Lawyers Argue Protective Order Would Violate His Free-Speech Rights The Wall Street Journal
- Trump argues against more restrictive rules over evidence in 2020 election interference case CNN
- Judge sets deadline to decide on protective order restraining Trump on evidence, witnesses MSNBC
- Trump posts another attack on judge ahead of first court deadline The Independent
- Trump attacks federal judge, because of course. Time for gag order USA TODAY
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
0 min
vs 1 min read
Condensed
-43%
53 → 76 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Wall Street Journal