"Trump's Battle Against a Restrictive Gag Order in Election Case"

Judge Tanya S. Chutkan has imposed a gag order on former President Donald J. Trump, barring him from making public comments targeting court staff, special counsel Jack Smith, potential witnesses, and others involved in the federal criminal case accusing him of seeking to overturn the 2020 election. However, the order leaves unanswered questions about which statements by Trump would violate the ruling and how he would be punished. Trump's legal team has already appealed the order, claiming it infringes on his First Amendment rights. The order allows Trump to criticize President Biden, his administration, and the Justice Department, as well as attack Mike Pence and campaign platforms. Ambiguities in the order raise concerns about conflicts over certain statements and the definition of attacks on witnesses. Violations of the gag order could result in contempt of court charges, but the enforcement process is complicated.
- Gag Order on Trump in Election Case Leaves More Hard Questions The New York Times
- Trump planning to appeal gag order in federal election case CBS News
- Takeaways from the testy hearing over the Trump gag order and what it means CNN
- Trump faces his biggest challenge yet: shutting up CNN
- How the gag order against Donald Trump goes too far Los Angeles Times
Reading Insights
0
1
6 min
vs 7 min read
89%
1,309 → 143 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times