Cooperating Witnesses Exposed in Epstein Files Prompt Redaction Backlash

TL;DR Summary
New York Times reporting shows seven defendants listed as 'proffer at 500' in the Epstein files were involved in or seeking cooperation with prosecutors; the DOJ's initial failure to redact their names led to public exposure that could endanger them, prompting a re-upload with redactions. The episode underscores how a rushed release of the Epstein materials risked sensitive information and raises questions about the department's handling of redactions and cooperating witnesses.
Topics:top-news#cooperating-witnesses#epstein-files#justice-department#politics#proffer-sessions#redaction-errors
- Justice Department Exposed Cooperating Witnesses in Epstein Files The New York Times
- Who Is Daniel Richman? Columbia Law Professor Says Epstein Files ‘Should Never Have Been Released’ Times Now
- Press Release: Congresswoman Luz Rivas Issues Statement on Review of Epstein Files Quiver Quantitative
- Epstein Files: Khanna Reveals Hidden Names news24online.com
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
5 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
93%
993 → 71 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times