Judges Skeptical of Mark Meadows' Attempt to Avoid Charges in Georgia Court

Federal appeals court judges expressed skepticism regarding Mark Meadows' argument that his election interference case should be transferred from state to federal court. Meadows, charged with two felonies, claims that as a former federal official, his case should be moved to a federal court for better protection of his rights. However, the judges raised concerns about certain aspects of Meadows' appeal and pointed out that the removal statute only applies to current federal officials. The case, being considered on an expedited basis, may ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis wants to keep the proceedings in state court, while Meadows hopes for a broader jury pool and arguments of immunity in federal court.
- Judges express skepticism of Meadows' removal in Trump case The Atlanta Journal Constitution
- Mark Meadows may be stuck in Georgia state court after appellate hearing MSNBC
- Mark Meadows' bid to move election interference charges to federal court met with skepticism by three-judge panel CBS News
- Judges dubious of Mark Meadows' bid to avoid facing charges in Georgia state court POLITICO
- Appeals court voices skepticism of Meadows bid to shift from Georgia court The Hill
Reading Insights
0
1
3 min
vs 4 min read
85%
794 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Atlanta Journal Constitution