Judges Skeptical of Mark Meadows' Attempt to Avoid Charges in Georgia Court

1 min read
Source: The Atlanta Journal Constitution
Judges Skeptical of Mark Meadows' Attempt to Avoid Charges in Georgia Court
Photo: The Atlanta Journal Constitution
TL;DR Summary

Federal appeals court judges expressed skepticism regarding Mark Meadows' argument that his election interference case should be transferred from state to federal court. Meadows, charged with two felonies, claims that as a former federal official, his case should be moved to a federal court for better protection of his rights. However, the judges raised concerns about certain aspects of Meadows' appeal and pointed out that the removal statute only applies to current federal officials. The case, being considered on an expedited basis, may ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis wants to keep the proceedings in state court, while Meadows hopes for a broader jury pool and arguments of immunity in federal court.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

3 min

vs 4 min read

Condensed

85%

794118 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The Atlanta Journal Constitution