AI's Challenges in Scientific Publishing and Journalism
TL;DR Summary
An analysis reveals that AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini are being used to mass-produce low-quality, redundant scientific papers, particularly in biomedical research, which can evade traditional plagiarism checks and flood the literature with synthetic studies, raising concerns about research integrity and the exploitation of open data sets.
Topics:technology#ai-generated-papers#biomedical-research#open-data#plagiarism-detection#science-and-technology#scientific-misconduct
- Journals infiltrated with ‘copycat’ papers that can be written by AI Nature
- AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers MIT Technology Review
- Science journalists find ChatGPT is bad at summarizing scientific papers Ars Technica
- ChatGPT is blind to bad science The London School of Economics and Political Science
- ChatGPT Fails Science Writing Test: Human Journalists Win Technology Org
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
92%
625 → 48 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Nature