"Supreme Court Divided: Amy Coney Barrett's Role in Bump Stock Ban Decision"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court appeared split over the legality of the Trump administration's ban on bump stocks, which enable semiautomatic rifles to fire at speeds rivaling machine guns. The ban was enacted after the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, and the justices seemed divided along ideological lines during the arguments. The case does not revolve around the Second Amendment but rather challenges the power of administrative agencies. A decision is expected by late June.
Topics:nation#bump-stocks#gun-control#second-amendment#supreme-court#trump-administration#us-supreme-court-gun-control
- Supreme Court Appears Split Over Ban on Bump Stocks Enacted Under Trump The New York Times
- Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments over bump stocks and machine guns CNN
- Supreme Court divided over federal ban on bump stock gun accessory Fox News
- What are bump stocks? US Supreme Court weighs Trump-era ban on gun attachments BBC.com
- Amy Coney Barrett will decide how deadly American weapons can be. Slate
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
82%
402 → 72 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times