Supreme Court sidesteps decision on social media liability shield
TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court declined to address the legal liability shield that protects tech platforms from being held responsible for their users' posts, leaving in place a broad liability shield that protects companies like Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Google's YouTube and Twitter from being held liable for their users' speech on their platforms. The court said it made that decision because the complaint "appears to state little, if any, plausible claim for relief."
- Supreme Court skirts decision on rule that protects social media companies from what users post CNBC
- Supreme Court shields Twitter from liability for terror-related content and leaves Section 230 untouched CNN
- Supreme Court avoids ruling on scope of internet company immunity from lawsuits over content posted by users NBC News
- Supreme Court punts ruling on breadth of big tech’s liability shield in Google, Twitter cases The Hill
- Google vs. Section 230: Supreme Court dodges fight over internet recs USA TODAY
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
72%
254 → 72 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNBC