"Trump's Gag Order Battle: Implications for Election Subversion Case"

A federal appeals panel is likely to restore the limited gag order in former President Donald Trump's federal election subversion case, but may loosen some restrictions to allow him to directly criticize special counsel Jack Smith. The panel of judges expressed skepticism towards Trump's claims that the gag order violates his free speech rights, but also posed sharp questions to prosecutors about the boundary between political campaign rhetoric and undermining a criminal case. The judges suggested that Trump should have the right to defend himself and criticized the special counsel's office for not proactively protecting jurors from online threats. The judges are expected to issue a ruling soon.
- Takeaways from the tense appeals court hearing over the Trump gag order in federal election subversion case CNN
- Appeals panel grills both sides on Trump's D.C. gag order The Washington Post
- Live updates: Trump lawyers argue against gag order in election subversion case CNN
- Trump fights gag order, but shutting him up would help GOP win 2024 USA TODAY
Reading Insights
0
0
7 min
vs 9 min read
93%
1,604 → 108 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN