Rachel Maddow and the Ethics of Broadcasting Untrue Things.

TL;DR Summary
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow faced backlash from conservatives after stating that the network couldn't "knowingly broadcast untrue things" as its reason for not airing former President Donald Trump's post-indictment speech live. Critics pointed out Maddow's past statements on COVID-19 vaccines and the Trump-Russia collusion theory. However, some media progressives praised the network's decision not to air Trump's remarks live, and CNN's Oliver Darcy retweeted Maddow's explanation without commentary. Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 federal felony counts stemming from the investigation into his alleged improper retention of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.
- MSNBC's Rachel Maddow becomes online punchline after saying network won't 'knowingly broadcast untrue things' Fox News
- Rachel Maddow explains why MSNBC didn't broadcast Trump's post-arrest speech The Independent
- Rachel Maddow Spots Trump's Most 'Personally Embarrassing' Part Of Indictment Yahoo News
- Why CNN and MSNBC Didn’t Carry Trump’s Post-Arraignment Speech Live Vanity Fair
- There is a cost to airing 'untrue things': Maddow on deferring coverage of Trump speech MSNBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
85%
605 → 90 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News