Prosecutors Admit Error in Menendez Bribery Trial Evidence
TL;DR Summary
Federal prosecutors admitted that jurors in former Sen. Bob Menendez's corruption trial were inadvertently shown evidence that should have been redacted due to congressional immunity concerns. However, they argue the error is insignificant as the evidence was likely "meaningless and impenetrable" to jurors, and it's improbable any juror noticed it among the 3,000 exhibits. Menendez's legal team may use this mishap to bolster their appeal, claiming constitutional violations. Menendez, found guilty of multiple charges, is set for sentencing in January.
Topics:nation#bob-menendez#corruption-trial#evidence-mishandling#juror-exposure#legal-appeal#politics
- Prosecutors say they mistakenly gave jurors access to evidence in Menendez case POLITICO
- Prosecutors say some erroneous evidence was given jurors at ex-Sen. Bob Menendez's bribery trial Yahoo! Voices
- Bob Menendez jury shown improper evidence by mistake, prosecutors say The Hill
- Bob Menendez jury was mistakenly shown improper evidence, prosecutors say Reuters
- Evidence goof prompts plea to preserve Bob Menendez’s corruption conviction New Jersey Monitor
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
81%
414 → 80 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on POLITICO