Judge's scathing critique of Trump's expert witness undermines defense in fraud trial

TL;DR Summary
The judge overseeing Donald Trump's civil fraud trial in New York criticized the credibility of an expert witness who was paid nearly $1 million by Trump to testify. The witness, an accounting professor, defended Trump's business records, but the judge stated that the witness "lost all credibility" by attempting to justify every misstatement. The judge denied several requests by Trump for the case to be decided in his favor. The trial, which focuses on damages, was brought by the New York state attorney general, who alleges that Trump's family real estate company overstated property values. Closing arguments are set for January 11.
- Trump's million-dollar expert 'lost all credibility,' judge in civil fraud trial says Reuters
- Judge rejects key points of Trump’s defense in NY civil fraud case in bad sign for former president CNN
- Judge Rips Credibility of Trump's Well Paid Expert Witnesses The Daily Beast
- Trump judge slams credibility of paid expert in fraud case, suggests fee influenced testimony CNBC
- Trump Fraud Trial Verdict Dependent on the Unconventional Judge Engoron The New York Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
81%
526 → 102 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters