Judge Engoron's Scathing Critique of Trump's Credibility and Failed Courtroom Tactics

TL;DR Summary
Judge Arthur Engoron rejected Donald Trump's appeal for a directed ruling in his civil fraud trial, highlighting "fatal flaws" in the former president's defense. Engoron criticized the testimony of an expert witness, who was paid $877,500, stating that "some experts will say whatever you want them to say." The judge dismissed Trump's argument that property valuations are subjective, calling it a "lie." Engoron described Trump's attempts to have the case thrown out as "frivolous" and is expected to decide on the punishment against the former president in late January or early February. Trump denies all wrongdoing and claims the case is politically motivated.
Topics:nation#civil-fraud-trial#donald-trump#financial-statements#judge-arthur-engoron#new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james#politics
- Judge Engoron Tears Donald Trump to Shreds Newsweek
- Trump judge slams credibility of paid expert in fraud case, suggests fee influenced testimony CNBC
- Trump Fraud Trial Verdict Dependent on the Unconventional Judge Engoron The New York Times
- New York AG Ridicules Trump's Failed Courtroom Hail Marys The Daily Beast
- Judge: Trump's star witness 'lost all credibility' after NYC fraud testimony Courthouse News Service
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
87%
782 → 103 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Newsweek