Democrats’ ICE Dilemma: Funding Fights and Guardrails, Not Abolition

TL;DR Summary
Democrats are split on how to curb ICE’s power: a full shutdown is unlikely to deprive ICE of funding since the agency is already sitting on billions from the Trump-era tax cuts, while redirecting funds to other agencies or pursuing guardrails faces stiff political hurdles. Some lawmakers advocate redirecting ICE money to local law enforcement or reforming DHS, but achieving consensus requires majorities and bipartisan buy-in. With a Jan. 30 funding deadline looming, many favor a stopgap (CR) while pressing for reforms, while others warn that a shutdown or punitive actions could backfire on the party and the broader immigration agenda.
- Forget abolishing ICE — the real Democratic divide is shutting down ICE Semafor
- Opinion | Congressional Democrats need to bring a knife to an ICE fight MS NOW
- Abolish ICE? It’s a Slogan Some Democratic Critics of ICE Would Abolish. The New York Times
- Democrats escalate opposition to DHS funding in bid to rein in ICE The Hill
- Murphy, DeLauro seeking Homeland Security reforms in funding bill CT Mirror
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
9
Time Saved
27 min
vs 28 min read
Condensed
98%
5,548 → 101 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Semafor