Post seeks return of seized reporter’s materials, warning of First Amendment chill
TL;DR Summary
Washington Post filed a court motion demanding the return of electronic devices seized from a staff reporter’s home, arguing the search violates First Amendment protections and safeguards for journalists, and risks a chilling effect on reporting.
Topics:nation#first-amendment#freedom-of-the-press#journalism#national-security#us-department-of-justice
- Washington Post demands government return materials seized from reporter The Washington Post
- FBI’s Washington Post Investigation Shows How Your Printer Can Snitch on You The Intercept
- Search of Reporter’s Home Tests Law With Roots in a Campus Paper’s Suit The New York Times
- FBI executes search warrant at Washington Post reporter’s home The Washington Post
- FBI raids home of Washington Post reporter in ‘highly unusual and aggressive’ move The Guardian
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
17
Time Saved
23 min
vs 24 min read
Condensed
99%
4,725 → 36 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post