Supreme Court's Decisions on Online Speech and Liability

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google, Twitter, and Facebook in lawsuits seeking to hold them liable for terrorist attacks. However, the court avoided the big issue of whether the federal law that shields social media companies from being sued over content posted by others is too broad. The court unanimously rejected a lawsuit alleging that the companies allowed their platforms to be used to aid and abet an attack at a Turkish nightclub that killed 39 people in 2017. The court also returned the case of an American college student who was killed in an Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris in 2015 to a lower court.
- Supreme Court avoids ruling on law shielding internet companies from being sued for what users post The Associated Press
- Supreme Court rules for social media giants in cases over third-party content, declines to address Section 230 Fox Business
- Supreme Court finds Twitter not liable for aiding terrorists MSNBC
- What Is Section 230? How Online Speech Is Moderated in US Bloomberg
- Analysis | How Speech Is Moderated Online in the US The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
83%
669 → 111 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Associated Press