"Supreme Court's Impact on January 6 Cases: Oral Arguments and Release of Rioter"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a criminal appeal challenging the Biden administration's use of a federal statute to charge J6 defendants, with the government arguing for an expansive interpretation of the law. Justices questioned the government's selective enforcement and overbroad reading of the statute, suggesting they may hold that it only criminalizes conduct that impairs evidence for use in an official proceeding, rather than creating an independent obstruction felony.
- Oral Argument In J6 Case Exposes DOJ's Partisan Lawfare The Federalist
- The Supreme Court wants to hand a victory to January 6 insurrectionists Vox.com
- How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's? The Week
- Delaware's Confederate flag carrying Jan. 6 rioter to be released The News Journal
- Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters CNN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
5 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
93%
982 → 71 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Federalist