Daniel Penny's Acquittal Sparks Debate on Subway Safety and Legal Repercussions

TL;DR Summary
Following Daniel Penny's acquittal in the criminal trial over the death of Jordan Neely, attention shifts to a civil lawsuit filed by Neely's father, alleging Penny's negligence and recklessness. The civil case, which requires a lower burden of proof than criminal cases, could potentially hold Penny liable and result in a monetary award. Legal experts compare the situation to O.J. Simpson's case, where he was acquitted criminally but found liable in a civil trial.
- Attention turns to civil case after Penny's acquittal in NYC subway chokehold trial Gothamist
- Daniel Penny Does Not Regret Role in Jordan Neely's Death on N.Y. Subway: 'I'll Take a Million People Calling Me Names' PEOPLE
- New Yorkers reflect on subway safety after Daniel Penny verdict BBC.com
- Daniel Penny explains in his own words why he restrained Jordan Neely on the subway for so long CNN
- Daniel Penny's lawyers weighing malicious prosecution lawsuit after trial: 'Collusion from the very beginning' Fox News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
89%
672 → 74 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Gothamist