Supreme Court's Ruling on Wedding Websites Sparks LGBTQ Protections Debate

The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled in favor of a Christian graphic artist, Lorie Smith, stating that she can refuse to design wedding websites for same-sex couples, despite a Colorado law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. The court argued that forcing her to create the websites would violate her free speech rights under the First Amendment. The decision suggests that artists and other expressive service providers can refuse services that contradict their beliefs, but it does not extend to businesses not engaged in speech, such as restaurants and hotels. The dissenting liberal justices warned that the ruling opens the door to discrimination by allowing businesses to refuse service to protected classes. President Joe Biden expressed disappointment with the decision, stating that it weakens laws protecting against discrimination.
- The Supreme Court rules for a designer who doesn’t want to make wedding websites for gay couples KTLA Los Angeles
- Bay Area legal experts react to SCOTUS decision on same-sex wedding ruling KPIX | CBS NEWS BAY AREA
- Supreme Court limits LGBTQ protections with ruling in favor of Christian web designer CNN
- Opinion | The Decision in 303 Creative Deals a Blow to Anti-Discrimination Law The New York Times
- Decision makes it clear: The court seeks to overturn gay marriage San Francisco Chronicle
Reading Insights
0
1
6 min
vs 7 min read
90%
1,294 → 128 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on KTLA Los Angeles