"US Supreme Court Defines Limits for Officials Blocking Social Media Users"

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court ruled that a city manager was within his rights to block a local critic from his Facebook page if he did so as a private citizen and not as an official act, despite the critic's contention that it violated his free speech. The ruling clarifies the circumstances under which public officials can limit access to their personal social media platforms and what rights the public may have in commenting on public matters on those sites. The decision is considered significant and sets a new standard for courts to determine whether a public official's social media activity constitutes state action.
Topics:nation#free-speech#law-and-politics#port-huron#public-officials#social-media#us-supreme-court
- US Supreme Court rules on officials blocking critics on social media in Port Huron case Detroit Free Press
- Supreme Court rules that public officials can block social media followers in some circumstances CNN
- Supreme Court Sets Rules for Blocking Citizens From Officials' Accounts The New York Times
- US supreme court tells lower courts to reconsider two free speech cases The Guardian
- Supreme Court sets rules on when public officials can block social media users ABC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
88%
891 → 103 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Detroit Free Press