"Assessing Trump's Immunity Arguments: Legal Experts Weigh In"

TL;DR Summary
During a federal appeals-court hearing, former President Donald Trump's lawyer argued that a president could not be prosecuted for actions taken in office, including ordering the assassination of a political rival, as long as Congress approved. A law professor criticized the argument as misunderstanding the Constitution and likely deserving a C or D grade. The appeals-court judges also expressed skepticism, with one judge offering hypothetical situations to challenge the argument. The professor pointed out that the Constitution did not support the lawyer's claims and suggested that the main goal of the argument may be to delay the trial.
Topics:nation#donald-trump#impeachment#law-and-politics#legal-argument#presidential-immunity#us-judges
- Law professor grades Trump lawyer immunity argument: C or D Business Insider
- Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on Donald Trump’s immunity claims CNN
- Judges “did not buy” Trump arguments on immunity MSNBC
- Opinion: Trump's attempt to intimidate a federal appeals court could ensure his defeat Yahoo News
- How Judge Pan completely imploded Trump lawyers' 'double jeopardy' immunity argument MSNBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
83%
563 → 98 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Business Insider