Supreme Court's Ruling Threatens Justice for Victims of Boy Scouts, Catholic Church, and Purdue Pharma
The upcoming Supreme Court ruling on the bankruptcy case of OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma could have far-reaching implications for victims seeking justice. The case centers around whether the Sackler family, former owners of Purdue Pharma, should be granted legal immunity from future civil lawsuits in exchange for paying up to $6 billion to victims of the opioid crisis. The decision may impact the use of third-party releases, which shield organizations accused of mass harm from additional civil lawsuits. Critics argue that such provisions allow potentially liable parties to avoid legal scrutiny, while proponents claim they provide a fair and efficient way for victims to receive compensation. The ruling could affect other high-profile cases, including those involving the Boy Scouts of America and Catholic dioceses.
- From the Boy Scouts to the Catholic Church, an upcoming Supreme Court ruling may mean some victims won’t see their day in court CNN
- Editorial: Don't let the Sacklers keep their blood money Times Union
- The Supreme Court is torn over Purdue Pharma's opioid settlement The Economist
- Court conflicted over Purdue Pharma bankruptcy plan that shields Sacklers from liability SCOTUSblog
Reading Insights
0
0
6 min
vs 7 min read
91%
1,298 → 123 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN