"Legal Battles Intensify Over Trump's Immunity and Smith's Appointment Validity"

TL;DR Summary
The DC appeals court is set to review the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment in the case against former President Donald Trump. Ed Meese, a former attorney general, filed a brief arguing that Smith's appointment by Attorney General Merrick Garland violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, as Smith is a private citizen and not properly appointed as a federal officer. The court has signaled it is taking the amicus briefs seriously and will address these issues during oral arguments. Meese contends that Smith lacks the authority to conduct the prosecution and that his appointment should be invalidated.
Topics:nation##appointmentsclause#constitutionality#donaldtrump#jacksmith#law-and-government#specialcounsel
- DC appeals court to review Jack Smith's 'unconstitutional' appointment in Trump case Fox News
- New question in Trump immunity appeal: Can it even be heard in court right now? MSNBC
- Former White House ethics lawyer says Trump will ‘very swiftly’ lose immunity claim The Hill
- Jack Smith Keeps Telegraphing Some Seriously Scandalous Trump Crimes The Daily Beast
- Opinion | Conservatives brief on immunity highlight how far the GOP has fallen - The Washington Post The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
87%
780 → 100 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News