"Harvard's Defense: Unraveling the Efficiency of Conservative Attacks on Higher Education"
Conservative activists successfully pressured Harvard University's president to resign, using tactics such as dog whistling, media pressure, and political leverage. This efficient strategy has dangerous implications for the future of education, as it emboldens conservative activists to attack diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, and could lead to the erosion of educational and racial justice advancements. The use of specific language and tactics mirrors historical strategies used to influence public opinion and demonize marginalized communities, and experts warn that the courts may be the only protection against further erosion of progress in education and racial justice.
- ‘Code words and dog whistling’: why the conservative attack on higher education is so efficient The Guardian
- Harvard submits plagiarism investigation documents to Congress CNN
- Harvard gives more detail of review of Claudine Gay plagiarism allegations The Washington Post
- Palestine, the alchemy of big lies and future of the university Al Jazeera English
- Harvard Defends Its Plagiarism Investigation of Its Former President The New York Times
Reading Insights
0
2
5 min
vs 6 min read
91%
1,010 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Guardian