Daniel Perry murder trial: Self-defense or murder?

TL;DR Summary
The lead police investigator in the Daniel Perry murder case testified that he didn't arrest Perry the night he fatally shot Austin protester Garrett Foster because it could be argued that it was in self-defense. The final witness in the eight-day trial, David Fugitt, said he felt he needed to do more investigation. One of the key issues in the trial has been that there were no videos or photos taken immediately before Perry shot Foster. Perry faces up to life in prison if convicted.
- Lead detective: I didn't arrest Daniel Perry because self-defense was possibility Austin American-Statesman
- Day 7 of testimony in Sgt. Daniel Perry trial wraps up KVUE.com
- Expert testifies Garrett Foster was inches away from Daniel Perry's car door in murder trial FOX 7 Austin
- Daniel Perry murder trial almost over, attorneys prepare for closing arguments KXAN.com
- Witnesses describe scene when Daniel Perry shot Garrett Foster in 2020 Austin American-Statesman
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
7
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
88%
718 → 85 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Austin American-Statesman