Jack Daniel's wins trademark dispute over dog toy parody in Supreme Court ruling.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Jack Daniel's in a legal battle with Bad Spaniel, a dog toy maker that parodies the whiskey brand. The court said that the use of a trademark does not count as non-commercial just because it parodies another's products. Jack Daniel's had tried to stop production and marketing of the dog chew toy, which features a spaniel and the name "Bad Spaniels" on the label instead of the iconic Jack Daniel's name. The company argued that the lower court was wrong to conclude that the toy was a "humorous" and "expressive" work and thus immune from claims that it infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker NPR
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel’s in trademark dispute involving a poop-themed dog toy CNN
- U.S. Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel's in fight over parody dog toy Yahoo Finance
- 'Poop-themed' Jack Daniel's dog toy parody not protected by First Amendment, Supreme Court says Fox Business
- Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel’s in ‘poop-themed’ dog toy trademark fight NBC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
73%
410 → 112 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NPR