Jack Daniel's Wins Trademark Battle Over Parody Dog Toy in Supreme Court

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Jack Daniel's in a trademark dispute with VIP Products over a parody chew toy resembling the distiller's whiskey bottle. The lower court's ruling that the "Bad Spaniels" vinyl chew toy is an "expressive work" protected by the First Amendment was thrown out. The decision could redefine how the judiciary applies constitutional free speech rights to trademark law. The dispute pitted the whiskey brand's trademark rights against legal protections for creative expression.
- US Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel's in fight over parody dog toy Reuters
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel’s in poop-themed dog toy trademark fight CNN
- Supreme Court Rules Against Dog Toy Resembling Liquor Bottle The New York Times
- U.S. Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel's in fight over parody dog toy Yahoo Finance
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker NPR
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
87%
600 → 80 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters