AI Copyright Lawsuits: The Battle for Sentient Bots and Unprotected Elements

Stephen Thaler, the inventor of an artificial intelligence (AI) system called DABUS, is appealing a federal judge's decision that he cannot claim copyright for an artwork created by the AI. Thaler has been involved in multiple lawsuits in different countries, arguing that DABUS should be recognized as an inventor. One of his main supporters, Ryan Abbott, believes that machine inventions should be protected to incentivize the use of AI for social good. However, legal experts argue that copyright and patent laws require human authorship and an independent mental conception, which AI systems like DABUS do not possess. The outcome of these cases will have implications for the future of intellectual property rights in the age of generative AI.
- The Inventor Behind a Rush of AI Copyright Suits Is Trying to Show His Bot Is Sentient WIRED
- Visual artists fight back against AI companies Associated Press
- The Implications Of AI Elements Not Being Protected By Copyright Forbes
- Reshaping The Canvas: The Thaler Echo Live Law - Indian Legal News
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
1
9 min
vs 10 min read
94%
1,844 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on WIRED