Prince Harry's Landmark Phone Hacking Victory Against UK Tabloid
Piers Morgan's statement on the recent High Court ruling that phone hacking and unlawful information gathering occurred during his tenure as editor at Mirror Group Newspapers has been annotated by the Claimants' legal analyst. The analyst points out that Morgan's statement is misleading, as there are still numerous articles from that period that have not yet been ruled on by the judge. The judge found that Morgan knew about voicemail interception and knowingly published articles based on it. The judge's findings contradict Morgan's previous denials, including those made at the Leveson Inquiry. Morgan's statement also includes personal attacks on individuals involved in the case, including Prince Harry.
- Piers Morgan's Statement on the Prince Harry Phone Hacking Case - Annotated – Byline Times Byline Times
- UK court rules Prince Harry was victim of phone hacking by tabloid group CNN
- Prince Harry's Phone Was Hacked by U.K. Tabloid, Judge Rules in Landmark Case The New York Times
- Prince Harry's phone hacking victory is a landmark in the long saga of British tabloid misconduct The Associated Press
- Prince Harry wins 'widespread and habitual' phone hacking lawsuit against British tabloid USA TODAY
Reading Insights
0
0
10 min
vs 11 min read
95%
2,023 → 107 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Byline Times