US Judge Rules AI-Generated Art Uncopyrightable

A U.S. federal judge has ruled that art created by artificial intelligence (AI) is not protected by copyright law. The judge upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office, stating that works generated by AI without human involvement are not eligible for copyright protection. The debate over copyrightable AI art continues, with some arguing that AI should be recognized as an author. The U.S. Copyright Office has expressed openness to granting protection on a case-by-case basis for AI-generated work created with human involvement. The ruling has implications for artists and those in the creative industry, as concerns grow about the potential impact of AI on jobs and the quality of art.
- Another judge agrees: AI-Created art isn’t copyrightable Mashable
- AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pause Hollywood Reporter
- Fully AI-Made Art Can't Be Copyrighted, Rules US Judge Gizmodo
- AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, rules a US Federal Judge The Verge
- Judge rules that strictly AI-generated artworks can't be copyrighted The A.V. Club
Reading Insights
0
1
2 min
vs 3 min read
78%
495 → 111 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Mashable