The Last of Us Finale: Ambiguous Violence and Bioethical Analysis.

TL;DR Summary
The season finale of HBO’s The Last of Us has raised a bioethics question: Is it ethical to kill one person for the well-being of many others? Arthur Caplan, head of the division of medical ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, discusses the role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in decision-making during an apocalypse, the importance of sound scientific protocol, and the moral implications of sacrificing one life to save many. He also reflects on the performance of institutions during the Covid-19 pandemic and their ability to handle future scenarios, from pandemic to apocalyptic.
- The Last of Us finale: A bioethicist weighs in on that final scene Vox.com
- The Truth Of Joel's Scar Is The Last Of Us' Biggest (& Best) Game Change Screen Rant
- The Last of Us viewers can't decide how they feel about the lack of infected in season 1 Gamesradar
- In 'The Last of Us' Finale, the Ambiguity Is the Point The Mary Sue
- 'The Last of Us' Season 1 Finale Shows Violence Is Still a Part of Joel Collider
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
7 min
vs 8 min read
Condensed
94%
1,513 → 96 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox.com