"Sotheby's Art Fraud Trial Exposes Dark Side of the Art Market"

TL;DR Summary
The Sotheby's art fraud trial concluded with the jury unanimously finding that Sotheby's had not played a role in any fraud, clearing the auction house of accusations made by Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. The trial shed light on the inner workings of the art market and featured testimony from Rybolovlev, who accused a Swiss art dealer of cheating him. The dealer, Yves Bouvier, was not a defendant in the case and expressed feeling vindicated after the verdict. Rybolovlev's interest in art was described as having begun almost accidentally, stemming from a need to fill empty walls.
- 5 Takeaways From the Sotheby's Art Fraud Trial The New York Times
- Russian billionaire loses Sotheby’s art fraud lawsuit involving ‘Salvator Mundi’ CNN
- Jury Finds Sotheby's Did Not Help in Any Fraud of Russian Oligarch The New York Times
- Sotheby’s Cleared of Fraud in Suit by Russian Billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev artnet News
- The Sotheby's trial revealed the art market's unsavoury practices The Economist
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
72%
341 → 96 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times