OpenAI Accuses The New York Times of Hacking ChatGPT for Lawsuit

TL;DR Summary
OpenAI has filed a motion seeking to dismiss parts of The New York Times's lawsuit, arguing that its chatbot, ChatGPT, is not a substitute for a Times subscription and that people do not use it for that purpose. The Times had accused OpenAI of using millions of its articles to train AI technologies, claiming that chatbots now compete with the news outlet as a source of reliable information. OpenAI's motion aims to narrow the focus of the lawsuit by dismissing four claims from The Times's complaint, including acts of reproduction that occurred more than three years ago and the violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
- OpenAI Seeks to Dismiss Parts of The New York Times's Lawsuit The New York Times
- OpenAI say NYT hacked ChatGPT to get certain results Axios
- OpenAI says NY Times 'hacked' ChatGPT to build copyright lawsuit, generate misleading evidence New York Post
- OpenAI: 'The New York Times Paid Someone to Hack Us' TorrentFreak
- Why The New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI Ars Technica
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
70%
353 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times